Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Inquiry Plan (part 3)
I worked out perfectly, since i had just finished assessing all my students on their math IEP goals, I knew where my students were at and what they need to move forward in their math skills. Both of the session focused on how to help students focus on learning and create a more hands on approach to learning math. I have learned about a new multiplication strategy to teach to my 4th and 5th grade students that is more creative and hands on. I have also learned more about teaching math to students with special needs in a more exploratory way to help them learn by creating and doing. This will give them the opportunity to work together and learn about how and why instead of only doing what I (the teacher) says to do.
I am very excited to get back into my classroom after this holiday break and use some of the strategies learned that focus on the needs of my students based on the data i have collected from this project. I will be videoing my 4th grade group based on the assessments given and focusing on skills they need using new methods of teaching I learned at the CEC conference.
Inquiry Plan (part 2)
I am looking forward to using this information to plan instruction for my students and see what their next progress monitoring assessments conclude.
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Inquiry Plan (part 1)
This week I also gave the Voyager Math post module test for module one and the pre module test for module two in 4th grade. All students in the 4th grade intervention group improved their knowledge from the pre module one assessment by at least 33%. I am ver excited with these scores. Two of the students in this group will be retaught the portions of the module they scored poorly on. Next week I plan to give the post module assessment for module one and the pre module assessment for module two for second grade.
I am very excited about the data I have already collected. It has helped me to plan instruction for next week, to reteach and focus on the missing skills. I am also very excited to see the data from the assessment tools I have created and use the information for planning instruction.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Task Five
How does this relate to the work you do in your classroom?
Every day I collaborate with the other teacher in my special education unit, the seven classroom teachers our students have for their homerooms, the speech and language pathologist, the occupational and physical therapists and the principle and vice principal. We discuss curriculum, student levels and needs for supports, how the supports are currently affecting the student and their progress in the classroom, behavioral needs and how we can all meet the needs of our students.
How does this deepen your thinking about this domain?
I have never thought about how I mentor to other teachers until looking farter into this domain. There are two new teachers whom I work closely with. One is another special educator in the building and the other is one of the speech language pathologists. Both of these people have come to me for advice or reflection with their own teaching and practices and I give them professional support. We share thoughts about lessons and I have helped them not only with content and behavior issues but technology issues as well.
How could this fit into your inquiry plan?
For my inquiry plan I am looking to find ways to better assess student progress and keep more efficient and student involved records. This relates to the blog where it states teachers should become students. I would like to learn more about effective record keeping and implement them into my classroom so my students can see themselves being successful.
The Video I found is Comprehensive Assessment: An Overview
How does this relate to the work you do in your classroom?
Many times I base behavioral, on task and academic data collection on everyday situations and student performance on formative assessments and not “test –environment” settings and data.
How does this deepen your thinking about this domain?
I love the quote stating students are “Over tested and under examined.” This makes so much sense. Standardized tests are only looking at one time of student performance on how much they can memorize. They do not look at problem solving or real student knowledge levels. Students need to dive into their work and focus on explaining and solving problems; this will increase their understanding and knowledge about the subjects being taught and most likely with peek their interests about academic performance, leadership and working together as a collaborative team.
How could this fit into your inquiry plan?
For my inquiry plan I am looking to find ways to better assess student progress and keep more efficient and student involved records. This relates to the video because I will look at how I am assessing student performance and how I can better assess performance through projects and tasks to deeper their understanding and knowledge. I could look at performance based assessments to see how students problem solve.
The article I found is An Educator’s Journey Toward Multiple Intelligences
How does this relate to the work you do in your classroom?
Because I teach students with special needs many of my assessments for progress monitoring involve manipulatives and verbal responses.
How does this deepen your thinking about this domain?
Assessments need to be based on the student’s best functional form of relaying information. If a student needs to move around or use counters to perform what he/she know at the highest level then those things should be available for him/her to use on progress monitoring assessments and all other assessments as well.
How could this fit into your inquiry plan?
For my inquiry plan I am looking to find ways to better assess student progress and keep more efficient and student involved records. This relates to the article to help me focus on the types of assessments I am giving students in relationship to the way they learn.
I am thinking about using this information and focusing on progress monitoring to not only learn how to achieve the highest about of information from the students but to do so in the way the student can perform best. Also, to give feedback relevant to the students where they are able to see their progress in the area being assessed.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Task Four
In domain 4, I am most comfortable with Component 4a: Reflecting on Teaching. I reflect a lot on my teaching and try to come up with better ideas and different strategies to move my student to achieve higher. This may sound weird but I love observations because I like the constructive criticism. I need others help to give me suggestions on all aspects of teaching especially when they have suggestions that will help my students move forward academically and socially.
Both components 4a and 4b strongly ties to instruction. Without reflection teachers are unable to fully understand lessons taught. They are unable to know if the lessons were effective and if the students learned or what the students learned and why. Record keeping is also very important. Teachers should have student work, formative and summative assessments and other student records to make instructional decisions and to know what students already know.
I would like to zero in on component 4b. I am able to reflect on lessons and do mostly, I have taken on many leadership roles in the district and school levels and I take to parents and give progress continually. Records are hard for me to keep and I would like to learn what is important to keep and effective strategies I can use for data collection. This leads into my questions:
What records do you keep?
How do you collect data? (how often and with what measure?)
Do you keep behavioral data or on-task/reminders data and how much?
Monday, September 28, 2009
Task Three :)
I would like to pick the last domain, domain 4.
Monday, September 21, 2009
Task Two
How much control do we have in the designing of curriculum? How much should we have? As a special educator I have a lot to do with the designing of the curriculum in my classroom. I am able to look at what the students in my classroom need to move forward in their education and create lessons that will best meet their academic needs and hopefully interest them. I think we should have a lot of control in the designing of curriculum especially in special education.
Ho does the curriculum that you have look like in your classrooms in a day to day environment? In my classroom we have many different curriculum and intervention programs to choose from. I teach all of the math in the MMD unit in my building and have assess to pull materials from the everyday math, number worlds and V-math curriculum. This year we are trying the V-math program and supplementing the other curriculum when we feel the students need extra practice or another way of looking at a math concept. I also pull a lot of materials from the internet and use many computer intervention programs. I feel very blessed to be in a teaching position where i am able to be flexiable and have the resources to pull the best curriculum for each of my studnets.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Module 2
We need to consider curriculum in all aspects of teaching. Curriculum needs to be standards based and proven effective by the appropriate data. Programs in curriculum need to work effectively and so do the interventions in the curriculum.
What model of curriculum do you feel best fits your current role? What model are you most attracted to? What would be your preference?
The curriculum that fits my current role the best is the correlated and fused curriculum because we work to combine information across content areas. I really like this model but I would like to move more towards the modern curriculum to help create more inquisitive students. I would love to combine all three of these models and create the super curriculum that would encourage students to learn and to want to learn and would combine all curriculums and create a collaborative environment for teachers and students
Wiggins talks about the need for a “modern” curriculum - what could this look like? Do you buy that we need a new approach to curriculum? Why or why not?
I really like the idea of the “modern” curriculum. The idea that the curriculum would be based on questions is wonderful. The modern curriculum reminds me of the Montessori Method how the teachers provide information or opportunities to get the students thinking and asking questions and the students learn at their level about what interests them. I love the quote, “To put students in the habit of thoughtful inquiry.” (p 47) To teach students how to want to learn and to be in the “habit of thoughtful inquiry” would be amazing. Students would want to learn more and would strive to be life long learners.
I think it would be very hard to move to a new approach to curriculum. It would be a great to try and move towards. Anything that would help students want to learn and be excited to learn is a great approach to learning.
Sunday, August 30, 2009
This is my first blog!! About me

This is my first blog post! My name is Sarah Pershing and I work at Campbell Ridge Elementary School in Campbell County. I teach MMD math and I am part of a co-teaching team. We currently have 30 students on our combined caseload from grades K-5. I absolutely love this job. I taught in Columbus , Ohio before moving to the area and was teaching algebra at an intercity high school. I am working on my masters and hope to be finished next summer.
I live in Grants Lick with my husband (Joe) and son (aka puppy, Titan). We moved into our first home in June and have spent the summer building a fence for Titan and a shed for Joe!
I am looking forward to this class and am very interested in learning more about using technology in my classroom.